CPP3 Collaborations 2019: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
Image:RS2 Venue 5.jpg|''Scaff for front legs'' | Image:RS2 Venue 5.jpg|''Scaff for front legs'' | ||
Image:RS2 Venue 6.jpg|''Seating Bank'' | Image:RS2 Venue 6.jpg|''Seating Bank'' | ||
Image:RS2 Venue 7.jpg|'''' | Image:RS2 Venue 7.jpg|''Seating Bank'' | ||
Image:RS2 Venue 8.jpg|'''' | Image:RS2 Venue 8.jpg|''Venue'' | ||
Image:RS2 Venue 9.jpg|'''' | Image:RS2 Venue 9.jpg|'''' | ||
Image:RS2 Venue 10.jpg|'''' | Image:RS2 Venue 10.jpg|'''' |
Revision as of 15:16, 15 January 2020
CPP3 Collaborations 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[[File:|200px]]
|
Overview
Technical Stage Department
This year’s CPP3 Collaborations brought forward a new challenge for the Technical Stage Department- creating a temporary venue in a rehearsal room. From the outset it was clear that some sort of structure would need to be built. The brand new self-climbing truss system was the perfect solution for this.
Design Considerations
At the beginning of the production process, several designs of a structure that would suit the rehearsal room were created. The main design consisted of a grid of 9m x 7m with 2 central spans of truss using t pieces to join them to the grid. We found out that trying to make these two central spans fit into the grid was basically impossible, after countless hours of making up different variations of truss lengths, coupler types and corner types to try and make the structure work, we opted to make the two central spans longer and sit them on top of the grid and ratchet strap them. Although special sections of H30V can be sourced to fill the odd gaps created when trying to make this kind of structure we decided to avoid this and just go for the easy option as we had limited time and also communications with blacklight were slow so we wanted to make sure that all the kit we were hiring would arrive and didn’t want to make any last minute adjustments to the quote.
Due to most of the RCS truss stock being used on Cinderella and Christmas at The Conservatoire we had to hire all the truss from Blacklight.
The new MPT system came with 5.5m of truss for each tower so we were able to achieve a trim height of 5M. We found this height was perfect as it meant we could use a 16x5 border as the back black and also use 2m soft steels to safety the truss. We used the old 7x4 legs to mask of the wings and the pit border as a front border as it was the perfect size drop. Truss borders were also used to mask the 2 central spans
For changing rooms we constructed a structure using tank traps and scaff, roughly around 6x2m giving two 3x2m changing rooms. Each room had 2 tables and 3 chairs.
The seating bank was designed to seat 50 people with a control position at the back. This worked really well for this size of room, it also left an appropriate fire path around the seating bank. We also stored several cases under the seating bank.
Future Considerations.
After discussions with Grahame, we decided that on seeing this year’s groups use the space, the full playing space was never really used, or was only used because it was there. If the truss structure was to be reduced in size to 8m x 6m it would make more room in the wings and backstage changing areas and would only reduce the playing space by roughly 1m in depth. The playing space in width would remain the same as loosing that meter of truss would bring the MPT towers further out of the wings but they would still be covered by the front soft masking as we had about a half meter overspill of drape on stage either side this year.
If the truss structure was reduced in size the changing rooms could have been made slightly bigger and also would mean more room for storing flight cases and equipment.
MORE DETAILS TO FOLLOW
Stage Management
LX Department
Sound Department
AV Department
.